I don't understand the meaning of the terms and conditions for male customers only, with the age limit being 35.If you can't trust male customers that much, I think you should stop attracting male customers at all and only attract female customers.In the first place, do the owners force only male users to present a copy of their family register or health insurance card to confirm their age and gender?Isn't the owner going to be sued for sex discrimination and age discrimination someday?I received a reply full of contradictions from the owner, so I will write it below as an answer.First of all, it doesn't matter whether you think they are discriminating against men or not.You are being criticized because you are actually discriminating against men.Do you think that if you say, "I don't believe that you are discriminating against men," it will not be discrimination against men?In Japan, a country ruled by laws, discrimination is determined based on whether or not it actually discriminates against men.Next, you claim that you want to "separate your residences," but "separation" literally means to separate your residences.If Harusakura Cottage is intended to have separate living areas, rather than restricting the use of one part of the customer, segregated areas are called unisex, male-only, female-only, etc.What you are doing is not ``separation of residences,'' but ``regulating the use of single men between the ages of 18 and 35.'' It is a discriminatory act in itself.Also, it seems like they place a lot of emphasis on the safety and security of family customers, but then why aren't there restrictions on female customers who are not family members?Regarding this, what you say and what you do are completely different.Furthermore, even though they emphasize safety and security, they are actually doing the exact opposite, such as disclosing the personal information of customers who have used the service through word-of-mouth reviews.The only person who is threatening your safety and security is yourself.I am commenting after viewing the homepage of [Spring Sakura Cottage], but if I had only stated the reason for restricting the use of male guests, I might have received sympathy and consent, but The contents are all discriminatory remarks against men.The graph comparing you to insects reveals your very humanity, doesn't it?Single men under the age of 35 are no better than insects, men should carry luggage, they don't care if male customers get bitten by snakes, etc., and I doubt their humanity as managers. Yo.I also think that one of the reasons why it became so popular was because of the lines such as, ``We welcome all female groups!'' which is full of a womanizing aura.In short, you were criticized by multiple people because you wrote "a sentence that added fuel to the fire" when you should have just written "the history of regulating male customers."By the way, I'm 36 years old, male, and married, and I meet the conditions to be able to use [Spring Sakura Cottage], but I don't think in the slightest that I would want to use an accommodation facility run by a [male discriminator] like you. , I don't want to lose even a single yen.Judging from your reply, it seems that you are not very good with the law, but even from a legal perspective, it would be physically impossible for you to restrict the use of single men, even if you had facility management rights.As a prerequisite, all customers are required to present a copy of their family register, My Number card, and health insurance card, and the crime of non-evacuation under Article 130 of the Penal Code is applied, and single men between the ages of 18 and 35 are allowed to use the facility. If you don't thoroughly enforce the regulations, etc., your argument will not be accepted at all.Unless you have sufficient documentation to explain the arrangement, what you are doing is no different from Big Motor's cheating.That's definitely a disqualification as a manager.Of course, I fully understand this, so don't worry.I fully understand that this is an act of discrimination against men by a man who is racist.